Let’s be clear about what is at stake here: NATO missiles on the adjacent Ukraine border
aimed directly at Russia would make that country extremely vulnerable to Western
goals and destabilization efforts while threatening Russia’s only water access
to its naval fleet in Crimean peninsula, the Balkans, the Mediterranean Sea and
the Middle East – and not the least of which would allow world economic dominance by the US, the European Union,
the IMF, World Bank and international financiers all of whom had already
brought staggering suffering to millions around the globe.
The fact is that democracy was not a demand on the
streets of Kiev. The current record of
events indicates that protests of civil dissatisfaction were organized by
reactionary neo-Nazi forces intent on fomenting a major
domestic crisis ousting Ukraine’s legitimate government. As events continue to spiral out of control,
here is the chronology of how the coup
was engineered to install a government
more favorable to EU and US goals.
April 11,
2011 - A Kiev Post article entitled “Ukraine Hopes to Get $1.5 Billion from IMF in June” states that the
loan is dependent on pension cuts while “maintaining cooperation with the IMF, since it influences the country's interaction with other international
financial institutions and private investors” and further that the “attraction of $850 million from the
World Bank in 2011, depended on
cooperation with the IMF.” Well, that
about says it all - if Ukraine played ball. then the loan money would pour
in.
November 21, 2013 - fast forward to the EU summit in Lithuania
when
President Yanuyovch embarrassed the
European Union by rejecting its Agreement in favor of
joining Russia’s Common Union with other Commonwealth Independent States.
November
27, 2013 – it was
not until February
23, 2014 when Anonymous Ukraine hackers released a series of
emails from a Lithuanian government advisor to opposition leader and former
boxer Vitaly Klitschko regarding plans to destabilize Ukraine; for example:
“Our American friends promise to pay a
visit in the coming days, we may even see Nuland
or someone from the Congress.” 12/7/2013
“Your colleague has arrived ….his services
may be required even after the country is destabilized.” 12/14/2013
“I think we’ve paved the way for more radical
escalation of the situation. Isn’t it
time to proceed with more decisive action?” 1/9/2014
November
29, 2013 - well-orchestrated protestors were already in the streets of Kiev as European Commission
President Jose Manual Barroso announced that the EU would “not accept Russia’s veto” of the Agreement.
December 13, 2013 - As if intent on providing incontrovertible
evidence of US involvement in Ukraine, Assistant US Secretary of State for
Europe and Eurasia Victoria Nuland proudly told a meeting of the International Business Conference sponsored
by the US-Ukrainian Foundation that the US had ‘invested’ more than $5 billion
and ‘five years worth of work and preparation” in achieving
what she called Ukraine’s ‘European aspirations.” Having just returned from her
third trip to Ukraine in five weeks, Nuland
boasted of her ‘coordinated high level diplomacy’ and a more than two hour
‘tough conversation’ with Yanukovych. Already
familiar with Nuland as former Secretary Clinton’s spokesperson at State, one
can imagine her discourteous tone and manner when she says she made it
“absolutely clear” to Yanukovych that the US required “immediate steps” …to
“get back into conversation with Europe and the IMF.” While
Western media have portrayed Yanukovych as a ‘weak’ leader, Nuland’s
description of a ‘tough’ meeting can only mean that he resisted her threats and
intimidations. In what must have been a
touching moment, Nuland spoke about a show of force by government police on
demonstrators who “sang hymns and prayed for peace.”
What
Nuland did not reveal on December 13 was that her meetings with ‘key Ukrainian
stakeholders’ included neo-Nazi Svoboda party leader Oleh Tyahnybok and prime minister wannabe Arsenly Yatsenyuk of
the Fatherland Party. At about the same
time Nuland was wooing fascist extremists, Sen. John McCain (R-Az) and
Sen. Chris Murphy (D- Conn) shared the stage in Kiev with Tyahnybok offering
their support and opposition to the sitting government. The Svoboda party which has roots with extreme
vigilante and anti-semitic groups has since received at least three high level
cabinet posts in the interim government including deputy prime minister. There is no doubt that the progenies of west
Ukraine’s historic neo-fascist thugs that fought with Hitler are now aligned
with the US as represented by Victoria Nuland.
January
24, 2013 –
President Yanukoyvch identified foreign elements participating in Kiev protests
warning that armed radicals were a danger to peaceful citizens.
Independent news agencies also reported that “not all of Kiev’s
population backs opposition rule, which depends mainly on a group from the
former Polish town of Lvov, which holds sway over Kiev downtown - but not the
rest of the city.”
January
30, 2013 - The State Department’s website Media Note
announced Nuland’s upcoming travel plans that ”In Kyiv, Assistant Secretary
Nuland will meet with government officials, opposition leaders, civil society and business leaders to encourage agreement on a new government and
plan of action.” In other words,
almost a month before President Yanukovych was ousted, the US was planning to
rid the world of another independently elected President.
February
4, 2013 - More evidence of Ms. Nuland’s meddling with
extremist factions and the high level stakes of war and peace occurred in her taped conversation with U.S.
Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt discussing their calculations of who’s in
and who’s out to replace Yanukovych. Note mention of Nazi leader Oleh
Tyahnybok. Here are some selected excerpts:
Nuland: “What do you
think?”
Pyatt: “I think we’re in play… the [Vitali] Klitsch
piece is obviously the complicated electron here especially the announcement of
him as deputy prime minister. Your argument to him which you’ll need to
make, I think the next phone call we want to set up is exactly the one you made
to Yats [Yatsenyuk]. And I’m glad you
sort of put him on the spot on where he fits in this scenario and I’m very glad
he said what he said in response.”
Nuland: “I don’t think
Klitsch should go into government. I don’t think its necessary. I don’t think
it’s a good idea.”
Pyatt: “yeah…I
mean I guess. You think…what…in terms of
him not going into the government, just
let him sort of stay out and do his political homework and stuff. I’m just thinking in terms of the process moving ahead, we want to keep the
moderate democrats together. The problem is going to be Tyahnybok
and his guys. I’m sure that’s what
Yanukoyvch is calculating on all this.”
Nuland: “I think Yats is the guy who’s got the
economic experience, the governing experience. What he needs is Klitsch and Tyahnybok on the outside and he needs
to be talking to them four times a week you know…I think with Klitsch going in
at that level working for Yats, it’s not going to work.”
Nuland: “My understanding is that the big three
[Yatsenyuk, Klitsch and Tyahnybok] were going in to their own meeting and that
Yats was going to offer in that context a three plus one conversation with you.”
Pyatt: “ That’s what he proposed but knowing the
dynamic that’s been with them where Klitsch
has been top dog; he’s going to take a
while to show up at a meeting, he’s probably talking to his guys at this point
so I think you reaching out to him will help with the personality management among
the three and gives us a chance to move
fast on all this stuff and put us behind it before they all sit down and he explains why he doesn’t like
it.”
Nuland: … “when I talked to Jeff Feltman this
morning, he had a new name for the UN
guy …Robert Serry – he’s now
gotten both Serry and Ban ki Moon to agree that Serry could come in Monday or Tuesday… so
that would be great I think to help glue
this thing and have the UN help glue it
and you know fuck the EU.”
Pyatt: “Exactly.
I think we’ve got to do something
to make it stick together because you can be pretty sure the Russians will
be working behind the scenes. ….Let me
work on Klitchko and I think we want to get somebody with an international
personality to come out here and help
midwife this thing.”
Nuland: ”…Sullivan’s
come back to me saying you need Biden
and I said probably
tomorrow for an” ‘atta’ boy’ and get the deeds to stick so Biden’s willing.”
February
20, 2014 – Foreign ministers from Poland, Germany and
France visiting Kiev secured President Yanukovych’s agreement that would commit the government to an interim
administration, constitutional reform and new parliamentary and presidential
elections. With “no clear sign that EU or US pressure has achieved” the desired
effect, opposition leaders rejected Yanukovych’s compromise
which would have ended the three month stand-off. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov called
on the German, French and Polish foreign ministers to step in and take
responsibility for upholding the deal they helped forge and not let “armed extremists” directly
threaten Ukrainian sovereignty.
February
21, 2014 - At a
special summit in Brussels, European foreign ministers agreed to adopt sanctions on Ukraine including
visa bans and asset freezes. The EU decision followed “immense pressure from the US for
the European powers to take punitive
action against the Ukrainian regime.”
Washington had already imposed travel bans on 20 leading Ukrainians.
February
22, 2014
– An hour after refusing to
resign,
the Ukrainian Parliament voted, according to Russian president Vladimir Putin,
in an unconstitutional
action
to oust President Yanukovych and that pro-EU forces staged a
‘coup’.
Yanukovych departed Kiev in fear for his
life.
March 1,
2014 - During
a conversation initiated by the vice president,
Biden delivered his ‘atta boy’ with a phone call to newly installed prime
minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk reaffirming US support for Ukraine’s
‘territorial integrity.”
All of the above machinations expose an incoherent and corrupt American foreign policy with a litany of US hypocrisy that might be hilarious if not for potentially grave global implications. The comment “you just don’t behave by invading another country on completely trumped up pretext” might just win Secretary of State John Kerry the Hypocrisy of the Year Award. Kerry, of course, famously supported the 2003 invasion of Iraq seeking weapons of mass destruction.
But then again, the President’s own comments that “..countries have deep concerns and suspicions about this kind of meddling..” and that “…as long as none of us are inside Ukraine trying to meddle and intervene.. with decisions that properly belong to Ukrainian people…” while announcing $1 billion aid package to Ukraine (but not Detroit) would be a close runner-up for the Award.